Rajasthan Water Resources
Status Evaluation and Need for Action
Alarming Situation
Rajasthan is possibly the driest state in
India. Although it has one- tenth of the
land area of the country, over 5 per cent of its population and nearly a fifth
of its livestock, its share of India’s surface and ground-water resources is
under 2 per cent each. The situation has
worsened over time. The state population
growth rate is among the highest in the country. Demand for water from uses such as industry,
tourism and sanitation and environmental purposes has grown apace, while the
supply has remained unchanged. The
primary source is scanty and uncertain rainfall confined to two months of the
year. Availability of water from all
sources has come down to under 800 cum per person per year and will soon reach a highly
precarious level. Nearly two-thirds of the state
is arid or
semi-arid. A disproportionate reliance on groundwater
adds to the problems of water availability, especially in drought years. Similarly, heavy reliance on 'imported'
water from neighbouring
states adds to the uncertainty.
Inefficiency in the storage, conveyance and use of water results
in further worsening of an already difficult situation. Iniquitous access to water by
different user groups, economic strata, and regions, as well as a steady
deterioration of water quality compound this poor situation. Thus, the water situation of the state is
quantitatively and qualitatively precarious and the state is faced with
formidable, almost insurmountable, handicaps.
Goals, Mission, Strategies
Water Security for All:
Water must be seen in an integrated and holistic manner, with a clear
understanding of the mission, objectives and areas of strategic intervention.
The state must accept access to water for survival as a basic human right. The goal of water security for all and
forever implies efficiency, equity, and sustainability as the guiding
principles of water resources management. .
The chief objective of the state water policy would be socially optimum
development and sustainable utilisation of the
state’s water resources. The mission
would be "to ensure efficient, equitable
and sustainable supply of water to the citizens of the state within a given
time frame."
Integrated Water Resources Management: In view of the finite
availability of and growing demand for water, the state water policy should
advocate an integrated approach and prioritise
various activities. All sources of
water, surface and ground, must be reckoned together, as should its uses, for
drinking, irrigation, industrial and other purposes, rather than treating each
fragment as an entity of its own. The solutions would go beyond
engineering or technology,
necessitating a multi-
disciplinary approach. Participation of
the concerned population in planning and managing the use of water, due
recognition of the crucial role of women and its incorporation in all decision spaces, and an explicit recognition of water
as an economic and social
good are all
components of integrated
water resources management.
Basins as Unit of
Planning: This suggests planning of water resources based
on dependable information at the river basin (or canal or aquifer) level, co-ordinated at the state level. The basin plans in
turn
could be sub-divided into watershed
development plans. This involves
realistic water budgets for the basin, transfers of water from surplus to
deficit basins keeping in mind the environmental impact of such transfers, and
establishment of basin management organisations. In these areas, bodies such as duly empowered
Water Users’ Associations would be required to ensure people’s effective
participation.
Elements of Strategic
Interventions: Besides the above, conjunctive use of surface
and ground water, requiring careful regulation of extraction and monitoring of
both these sources and their
integrated utilisation,
facilitated through appropriate and rational pricing of water will be crucial
strategic interventions. Clear
delineation of the roles of various stakeholders – households, government, NGOs, panchayati raj institutions,
private bodies -, establishment of water
rights and an enabling legal framework are adjuncts of the interventions. Supportive measures include building up the
capacities of users’ organisations enabling them to
discharge their legitimate and warranted functions effectively, and state-wide
data base, with appropriate monitoring and updating mechanisms.
Augmentation of Water Supply
Supply Deficits and Bottlenecks: The available
supply is short
of the state’s
requirements by some 8 BCM at present, which will go
up to 9 BCM by 2015. Natural monsoon precipitation
averages 590 mm in the state, but varies widely from region to region and year
to year. The bulk of it is lost due to
run-offs or evaporation. There are no perennial rivers. A large part of state's water supply is
through inter- state flow of water,
which adds a political dimension to the problem. As the experience all over the country
suggests, riparian states try to pre-empt the water to meet with their
own growing needs. Excessive
dependence on progressively
dwindling ground water resources
with continuously rising cost
of extraction is another serious difficulty.
Conservation as Means of Augmenting Supply:
Since the availability cannot be increased, measures such as rain water
harvesting, expeditious completion of projects under implementation, harnessing
untapped potential and full utilisation of potential
already created, re-charging ground water in a campaign mode, reducing
evaporation losses, recycling the used water and, above all, saving of water by
more efficient ways of conveyance and application all become important means of
conserving supplies.
Special Attention to Ground
Water Resources: Rajasthan is overwhelmingly
dependence on ground water. Nearly 90
per cent of the drinking water and 60 per cent of the irrigation water is
extracted from ground water reservoirs.
Over a period of time this situation has become precarious. Only 32 blocks in the state can be considered
"safe". Overall exploitation
of ground water at 11.6 BCM now exceeds overall
recharge of 11.1 BCM Intensive efforts for recharging
ground water are called for. Artificial recharge may be possible in
several areas, which must be attempted forthwith. The quality of ground water has progressively
deteriorated as wells are dug deeper and deeper. Techniques such as reverse
osmosis, electro-dialysis, flash distillation, etc have been used in
other states to improve water quality.
Their utility to specific areas of Rajasthan needs to be explored. They should be used wherever they are
cost-effective. The application of these
technologies must be accompanied by proper education and sensitization of the
users to their importance.
Rights and Obligations:
The communities' usufruct
rights for a given aquifer must be recognised,
and accompanied by dependable information on the availability of ground water
resources in the given aquifer. The
community should be sensitised to share this water responsibility. Those who extract ground water should also be
obliged to re- charge it. Supportive
regulation to control extraction of ground water, especially in the “dark” and
potentially dark zones is required.
Supporting
Measures: All these tasks require a massive campaign to
educate the people regarding the severity of the crisis and criticality of
suggested actions. The
campaign must make effective use of all mass media and involve NGOs, which are
better equipped to create mass awareness and mobilise
people for such actions.
Domestic Use of Water
Increasing Demand,
Dwindling Supply: The problem of drinking water in Rajasthan is
particularly acute. The current demand
of about 2.5 BCM for this purpose is likely to double
in the next 40 years. Another 2.0 BCM will be needed in that year for cattle for drinking
purposes as well. Rapid population
growth, rising demand, neglect of old traditional sources, silting of
reservoirs, change in land use, etc have shrunk the availability of water
resources during the last few decades.
Consequently, ground water resources have been over-exploited and their
quality has also deteriorated. All these
factors have affected sustainability of sources for drinking water supply.
Remedies for Supply: A
review exercise for each drinking water supply scheme to estimate demand of
water for drinking and other civic uses for the next 10 to 20 years is needed
to ensure its sustainability.
Availability of water from different sources should be assessed as a
part of the exercise. Planning for
drinking water supply should ensure meeting the demand with 90 per cent
reliability. Additional sources should
be created well before the availability is likely to drop below the
sustainability. In case of groundwater sources, maintaining a
carry-over storage of water equivalent to the demand for one year
(excluding evaporation and percolation losses) would be desirable. Such schemes should also include recharge by
an amount equivalent to annual withdrawal.
Artificial recharging should be resorted to if found feasible.
Poor Quality and its Rectification:
The quality of ground water in the state, as indicated by the presence of
various impurities and sediments, is among the poorest in the country. A number of schemes have been taken up, or
are being planned to supply safe water to problematic villages/habitations. The proportion of such benefitted
villages, however, is quite small. This
requires immediate correction.
Equity Considerations: The norms
for urban water
supply need to
be revised downwards to ensure that there is some
parity between urban and rural availabilities and the supply is stretched to
meet the requirements. Indiscriminate
sinking of wells for domestic water supply leads to drying up of these wells
and falling water tables. This needs to be checked.
Costing, Economics and People’s Participation:
The cost of supplying drinking water is rapidly increasing, as local sources
are either not available or not adequate, causing water to be conveyed over
long distances. The government cannot
bear all this cost. Community
participation could result in significant saving in operation and maintenance
costs. While the government could bear
capital costs, users should bear the operating costs. Poorer sections, however, should be provided
targeted subsidies to ensure that paucity of means does not imply denial of
access to water. Public- private partnerships,
especially in cities, could similarly reduce costs and increase revenue realisations.
Distribution losses, non-revenue supplies, low recovery
of operational costs, replacement of
over aged and malfunctioning equipment, adequate funds for maintenance are some
of the other issues that need to be addressed urgently to ensure that the
available water is used efficiently and effectively. As with other areas of water management,
participation of an informed citizenry and NGOs in these tasks would greatly
improve the situation.
Irrigation Management and Reforms
Major but Inefficient
User Segment and Tasks Ahead : Irrigation claims the
lion's share, over 80 per cent, of
the available water supply
in Rajasthan, as it does elsewhere in the country. It is also among the worst offenders in terms
of losses and inefficiency. Inadequate
use of created potential, poor condition of irrigation head works, canals, distribution structures, poor conveyance
efficiency, absence of people’s participation, irrational water
rates, inadequate support from agriculture department for optimum water use,
etc are among the factors leading to such a situation. The tasks are two-fold: rectifying the current
situation and managing the resource judiciously in the future to
ensure its optimal
use. A mix of policy,
technological, agronomic, and economic measures is required.
Policy and Technology Issues:
The existing poor efficiency of canal irrigation needs to be improved by emphasising maintenance.
Completion of projects underway, using available potential (as in
southern humid basins), improving storage, etc will improve the availability of
water. Legal framework needs to be
modified to ensure people’s participation, compliance with drainage
and conjunctive use measures.
Extensive, as against intensive, irrigation needs to be given preference. Adoption of pressure and drip
irrigation, encouragement of deficit
irrigation, recourse to lift
irrigation, would all serve the purpose of economising
water use. Some small, gated structures
upstream may be permitted to meet the needs of local inhabitants, with a
sharing formula that reserves the entire monsoon flow for the big system and
the post monsoon flow for the small structures. Structures
downstream help harvest the overflow and the seepage of big systems as also the
return flow of the canals. Proper
agronomic practices as well as selection of crops that use less water will
again help improve irrigation water use for crop production.
Irrigation Management and People’s Participation:
Formation of Water Users’ Associations and their involvement in various
operational and management tasks is essential for improving the water use
efficiency and effecting savings of water and expenses. Such organisations
could be educated in the conjunctive use of ground and surface water to help
improve water use pattern as well as avoid salinity. Their capacities need to be built up,
primarily through NGOs. PRIs also have a legitimate role to play. Sectoral and
project studies help identify the environmental impact of projects should be
mandatory for major and medium projects.
These would help design environment-friendly projects in future.
Economic Issues:
Water allocation priorities are drinking water, irrigation, power generation,
industry, tourism and other uses in that order.
Allocations for the water sector must at least be protected if not
increased in view of the dire situation.
The available funds must be judiciously allocated, first to maintenance
and restoration of existing assets, next to completion of on-going projects and
finally to new projects. The present low irrigation rates in the state do not
reflect the scarcity value of water, nor the cost of
providing it. The guiding principle
could be to recover at least the full O&M
costs. Incentives to those who apply the
recommended measures as well as penalties or disincentives for those who
willfully neglect such recommendations are desirable. Implementation of the various
reforms and changes
in irrigation management, especially those
associated with water rates, will require strong political will and great
courage.
Administrative and Legal Aspects
Persistent Problems:
Administration of the water sector in Rajasthan, as in other states of the
country, suffers from many defects.
These include widening of the government role and consequent shrinking
of the role of the community; attendant bureaucratisation,
marked by a hierarchical, top-down, and fragmentary approach; profusion of departments
and agencies with limited
co-ordination among them;
simultaneous pursuit of development, management and regulation, with emphasis
on development and neglect of maintenance, which affects
efficiency and reduces
accountability. The administration is
not people friendly, its approach fragmentary and its competence lop-sided.
Recommended Structures:
The situation needs to be rectified at all levels and along many
dimensions. At the ground level, WUAs need to be strengthened and enabled to take on
increasing roles in the planning and operation of specific projects in their
areas. This must form the foundation of
the administrative structure. They must
receive adequate technical and managerial support to be truly effective. Basin level committees should be formed and
given adequate technical and financial resources to manage their areas. These would help fill the gap between the
ground level and the state. A
state-level water resources development organisation
with multi-disciplinary staff should be set up. This department will take on
the tasks which are presently distributed among many different ones with
diverse interests and thus help achieve integration. Placing the policy and planning function in a
new, separate and highly professional department is essential for the state to
manage this scarce and valuable resource in the broader public interest rather
than being dominated by narrow sectoral interests as
at present. Implementing departments and
agencies should concentrate on cost-effective and efficient service delivery in
their respective sub-sectors and ensure proper functioning and productivity of
the state's massive investment in the water resources infrastructure created
over the years. This department should
be directly under the Chief Minister and headed by a very senior
administrator. A high-level State Water
Council to oversee the whole sector from a wider perspective, ensuring
efficiency and equity should be formed.
It should have a limited but functional co- ordination
and not merely
be a decorative
appendage. A separate regulatory organisation
is also needed to give due attention to this important task. Such a body whose credentials are above board
should initiate
the move towards more rational water rates.
Legal Aspects: The
State Water Policy would be enforceable only if it is backed by a comprehensive water legislation. A law relating to management and rational use
of surface water, ground water and share in interstate river waters is long
overdue. The first task is to filter and
clean the large number of laws on this subject. Some existing laws or their
provisions that have outlived their utility must be repealed or amended.
Ownership of water should not vest in the government but it should be the
property of the people. The riverine community as well as those who have land above
ground water sources may have usufruct rights subject to overall needs of the
community. Enforceable rules for regulating
ground water supply,
combining positive and negative economic and administrative
measures need to
be in place.
A comprehensive Water Law will be the final, culminating reform.
Civil Society Organisations
Policies for NGOs: Since
public participation is essential in the critical water resource development
activities, NGOs, which are close to people could play
a pivotal role in mobilising and organising
them as well as enhancing their capacity for undertaking the various tasks. NGOs are much better equipped to create the
above pre-conditions than the government.
The NGO policy framework is based on certain lessons drawn from
Rajasthan and elsewhere. Water sector programmes must
generate a sense of ownership among the users and allow freedom to
innovate. Collaboration among
government, NGOs and user groups should be institutionalised
in with specific and streamlined roles and responsibilities of each partner.
Scope for NGO
Participation: NGOs could be effective in awareness building in
communities, capacity
building of WUAs, design and construction
of water harvesting and conservation structures,
design, execution and management of minor irrigation projects, sharing
experiences and information with various stakeholders, and integration of
information from various sources. NGOs
should be fully involved to the extent required in such activities. More experienced NGOs should also find
representation in planning forums at the state and the district level.
Modalities
for NGO Participation: Certain procedures should be
followed to encourage involvement of the right kind of
NGOs. These procedures cover their
registration and empanelment, their assessment, approval of their projects,
sanction and release of funds and their monitoring. Detailed provisions and formats have been
evolved for these purposes.
Expeditious Process and Transparency: All these
recommendations concerning registration of NGOs,
identification, screening of projects, technical approval, various sanctions, fund release,
etc must be
time-bound and transparent
without compromising the quality of the
projects and works. The intention is not
to create one more category of civil contractors or to curb any existing good
treatment offered to the reputed NGOs in entrusting the works. The main purpose is to facilitate people’s
participation in this extremely important task by institutions that are closer
to people and are capable of empowering them.
Ensuring Participation of Stakeholders;
Clarifying their Rights and Obligations
Avoiding Dependency:
The commanding position of the bureaucracy has in managing water resources
leads to a dependency syndrome among water users. The reason for several ills in this area is
the alienation of users from the process of planning and distribution of water
resources. Farmer participation has led
to improvement in water use efficiency in several states.
Improving People’s Participation: WUAs positively impact irrigation to the tail- ender, area under irrigation
and revenues. They provide effective participatory management and need
strengthening. Similarly, the
involvement of the constitutional PRIs in water budgeting
and auditing helps improve
people’s participation. Inventorising
the needs and availability of water at the panchayat
level and collating them at the basin level, and again at the apex level will
impart strength to local level institutions.
Obligations: Obligations
of water users are difficult to define, especially in view of depleting ground
water resources. It may be necessary to
put a moratorium on digging wells not just in the dark zones, but even in other
areas where paucity of ground water is imminent. It is necessary to put in an obligation of
recharge on well owners. Restrictive
regulations, such as prohibition on digging wells in command area of canals,
may be withdrawn.
Cost Recovery and Privatization
Basis
for Rationalisation:
Beneficiaries pay an inadequate amount, whatever may be the concept and
components of cost irrigation. Drinking
water should be considered a ‘natural’ good and a minimum supply of drinking
water should be available to every citizen as a matter
of right. The state should reimburse
the public authority
responsible for supplying drinking water to truly indigent sections. Rationalisation of irrigation dues between crops and
between regions and the charges levied on drinking water with different
quantum of availability
need priority attention. Such rationalisation will lead to better compliance. The idea of cost recovery will not float
without addressing the issues of efficiency and accountability of service
providers.
Privatisation:
Private investment in surface water projects has not evoked much interest. Unresolved public policy issues in the
environment and social spheres impinge on large-scale private investment in the
development of water resources. Private markets, particularly in irrigation, are
justified, as it is a commercial, profit- oriented, activity. Water could be considered as an economic good
in that context. Water markets are, however, not easy to establish nor a panacea for all water-related problems. Pre-conditions for their successful
functioning resemble those for all contractual transactions.
Water Literacy and Awareness
Generation
Changing
Perspectives: The success of reforms in the water sectors
hinges on public. There is a need to inculcate more balanced view that water is
a scarce resource with multiple uses, multiple claimants and is inequitably
distributed over time and space. There is also a tendency to view water related
problems in a short-term perspective. These perspectives could be corrected by
opinion leaders in different walks of life, whose help should be sought while
introducing reforms. This is especially
useful, since the effect of price on controlling consumption will not be
significant if the share of expenditure on water is relatively small in the
consumer's budget.
Water
Education: This is needed at all levels. A concerted effort to educate students in
their youth will have a lasting effect in terms of appreciation of water
situation. The population at large
should be sensitised to the critical
nature of the water situation. to the
goals of efficient, equitable and sustainable water sector. This could be possible by creating awareness
about the benefits from reforms, and the price that is being extracted by
present systems and arrangements, together with progressively enlarging the
constituency of those who will benefit from the reforms.